Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Australia Backstops Its Art Market

March 9, 2009 by Marion Maneker

The Australian runs a fascinating profile of the country’s Artbank, an institution consciously constructed to support the art market in times of trouble. Geoffrey Cassidy, the organization’s head is front and center:

Established by the federal government in 1980, Artbank has grown into one of the nation’s largest collections of contemporary Australian art. It rents to private, corporate and public bodies for a fraction of the purchase price. “We’re about supporting the art market generally and artists in particular,” Cassidy says.

But as the art market contracts as part of the global financial crisis, Artbank is preparing to take an active role by helping stabilise the sector. While other buyers are expected to cut back on spending to adjust to the downturn, Artbank will maintain its purchasing rate at present record levels. Cassidy says the move will work as a kind of stimulus package for Australian art.

“We come into our own now,” he says. “This is what we’re all about.”

Cassidy says Artbank’s prospects are healthy: the agency became self-funding in 1992 and its collection is valued at more than $35million. The amount it spends on art — it buys only from living Australian artists — has increased to a record $1 million in the present financial year. He leaves open the possibility that Artbank’s purchasing budget will remain static next year. But he says it is unlikely to go any lower than its present level regardless of any looming recession.

“We see ourselves as supporting not just the artists but the art market as well. It’s about keeping the whole system strong,” Cassidy says. “When everything is booming and everyone is selling their work, we’re not as important. But if other people have pulled out, we’re still going to be out there doing it.

Artbank Ready to Lend a Hand (The Australian)

Is This a Good Time for a €100 Million Art Fund?

February 22, 2009 by Marion Maneker

According to the Financial Times, Robert Tomei–who runs an Italian private equity firm called Advanced Capital–has raised €100 million in co-operation with Phillips de Pury:

The fund will mostly buy contemporary art, but will also invest in photography and design. Mr Tomei is a keen art collector himself, as well as chairman of the investment committee of the Peggy Guggenheim Foundation and board member of the Tate Museum in London and the New York Museum of Modern Art. He and Phillips de Pury have already shown they can make money from art, having made 16 per cent-plus annual returns on the three previous art funds they advised.

Indian Private Equity Firm Claims Madoff Fallout Helpful [sic] (Financial Times)

Phillip Hoffman Talks His Book

January 12, 2009 by Marion Maneker

The Times of London has a brief story on The Fine Art Fund’s Phillip Hoffman’s interest in making a move on the declining market:

Hoffman said he expected prices for some art categories – modern and Impressionist works in particular – to fall by as much as 30% this year. “I am now regularly being approached by wealthy individuals or family estates that are looking to sell art without the publicity of going to auction,” he said. “Unfortunately, at the moment their expectations on price are way too high.”

Evidence is mounting that after years of spectacular growth, art prices are falling. The Mei Moses index, which tracks auctions, suggests prices fell by 4.5% last year, after five years of growth averaging 20% a year. Artprice.com, which also tracks auctions, said that the proportion of works worth more than €1m (£882,000) left unsold increased sharply in the second half of last year.

Hoffman said some art owners would have to accept big losses if they needed a fast sale.

Fine Art Fund Group will cash in on falling prices (Times of London)

KiptonArt

December 11, 2008 by Marion Maneker

Kipton Cronkite is head of investor relations for alternative investments (say that three times fast) with Bank of America. He’s also on the art and party circuit. Suddenly, he seems to be everywhere (here he is in Vanity Fair.)

At Art Basel Miami, he hosted a party with Asprey sponsoring, for his company KiptonArt. Barron’s profiled him recently:

He pulled together a blue-chip panel of art-world experts and had them screen artists who had submitted portfolios of their work online. The artists seen as most promising would get help from those experts to get to the stage where their work could be exhibited in a gallery.

Cronkite’s Website, KiptonArt, now has 650 registered artists, and has hosted more than 30 events to bring together young artists and collectors. “Some are [now] getting representation at great galleries,” Cronkite says.

So we’re curious to hear more about their success stories.

Who Are The Speculators?

November 17, 2008 by Marion Maneker

At a panel discussion led by Lindsay Pollock a few months ago, Roland Augustine, the president of the ADAA, casually described the majority of contemporary art buyers as “speculators.” Put aside the strangeness of a trade association head branding the bulk of his industry’s customers with a perjorative.

Focus on the issue of speculation. Can the majority of art buyers in 2007 and 2008 really have been speculators? Who are these people and can no one identify a single one of these speculators?

The subject comes to mind again after last week’s report on the Phillips de Pury sale contained this quote from an art advisor [emphasis ours]:

Grotjahn’s colorful early painting, with a low estimate of $400,000, didn’t find a buyer. Another work — a fiery orange butterfly painting — fetched $458,500 against the estimate range of $450,000 to $650,000.

In 2003, paintings by the Los Angeles-based artist cost around $20,000, said his New York dealer Anton Kern. In May, one of his canvases fetched $1.2 million at Phillips in New York, setting an auction record for the artist.

“You can’t have increases like that unless people are buying for investment purposes or everyone is leveraged,’‘ said Cristina Delgado, a New York art adviser, before the auction. “We need to come down to prices in the art market before everyone began leveraging, probably another 30 to 40 percent.”Continue Reading

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • British Modernists Draw Deep Bidding in Christie's $42 M. London Sales
  • $10 M. Picasso Portrait Unseen for Decades to Sell at Bonhams
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • Miami Sales Report 2015
  • The Billion-Dollar NYC Apartment of Ben Heller
  • About Us/ Contact
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor