Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Overshadowed Art

October 15, 2018 by Marion Maneker

The NY Times Decries Its Own Banksy Distraction; Mystery de Kooning Makes a Million; Sotheby's 1st Dibs Killer

This commentary by Marion Maneker is available to AMMpro subscribers. (The first month of AMMpro is free and subscribers are welcome to sign up for the first month and cancel before they are billed.)

Who Ignored Out Jenny Saville’s Star Turn?

Blasted under the headline, “A Landmark Achievement for a Painting by a Woman, Upstaged by a Man,” the New York Times put the art world on notice on Friday. The paper’s concern was that an important milestone was getting ignored by some cheap art world hype surrounding Banksy’s late-auction stunt:

  • “She should have been the center of attention, but somehow everyone got distracted. The nude self-portrait “Propped,” by Jenny Saville, was bought by a telephone bidder at Sotheby’s on Friday night for 9.5 million pounds, or about $12.4 million. That should have made plenty of headlines.”

With such a strong statement of chagrin in both the lead paragraph and the article’s headline, you might think the New York Times had resisted the cheap sensationalism of a street artist spoofing the toffs at an art auction. Yet the morning after Sotheby’s sale, the Times led with 22 paragraphs on Banksy’s prank before mentioning Saville in the 23rd.

The same author returned the next day with a second article on Banksy. This time the lead sentence was, “Everybody’s talking about it.” That was over an article analyzing the effect of the prank on Banksy’s market value. No mention was made of Saville’s sale or any other significant sale in the auction cycle that concluded the day before.

It took almost a week before the New York Times considered the Saville sale news that could lead a story.

****There’s an interesting footnote to all of this. In August, a Canadian political cartoonist who was working in Glasgow in the 1990s has tried to point out the similarities between 16 of her images and some of Banksy’s work.


Sign up to Art Market Monitor Premium today

You need a membership to AMMpro to view this article and other exclusive content daily.

You can register today for $90 per month—with your first month free!—or for $756 per year (no free trial period.)

Screenshot 2016-08-05 16.28.45

If you already have an account, sign in here:

 
 
Forgot Password

Filed Under: Premium

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • After Pandemic’s Rapid Change, Sotheby’s Has 8 Predictions for 2021
  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • A Season of Improvisation: Fall 2020 New York Modern and Contemporary Art Auction Analysis
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • Phillips Includes $2.5m Norman Rockwell Painting in November Evening Sale
  • Tracey Emin Neon Lights Up Sotheby's 'Contemporary Showcase' Pop-Up
  • $5 M. Cecily Brown's Carnival and Lent to Star in Christie's London Session of July Evening Sale
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor