Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Did David Rockefeller Really Have Such Dowdy Taste, Make Bad Art Investments?

May 11, 2018 by Marion Maneker

The New York Times spends a great deal of time and energy complaining about the use of art as an asset. So it is a bit of surprise to see their art market columnist sum up the Rockefeller estate sale by complaining that Peggy and David Rockefeller, who bought widely across a number of categories ranging from duck decoys to Asian art and American art of many eras, were insufficiently investment minded.

Although their taste in art never advanced beyond Abstract Expressionism and, it is important to remember that the sale does not include the many works the Rockefellers donated to museums (a virtue the New York Times is very vocal about,) David Rockefeller commissioned work from Jean Dubuffet and Alberto Giacometti for One Chase Manhattan Plaza. One of the works that began as part of that commission was defining moment in the art market when it sold for a record price in 2010. Earlier, David Rockefeller’s Rothko kicked off an upward explosion of the Rothko market before and after the global financial crisis.

Finally, it is often forgotten that the David Rockefeller was the beneficiary of a great fortune but not the possessor of it. That objects he bought to decorate his homes and satisfy his collecting passion should yield more than $830m for charity is an accidental investment achievement to be marveled at.

Yet here’s how the NYTimes characterizes it:

“The collection overall is very dowdy, very end of an era,” said Wendy Cromwell, an art adviser based in New York. […]

During the early 1950s, the couple was spending thousands on Sèvres and Spode dinner services at a time when a Jackson Pollock drip painting could be bought for $800. […] the numbers would have been even bigger had the Rockefellers bought Pollock rather than porcelain.

What if the Rockefellers Had Bought Pollock Instead of Porcelain?  (The New York Times)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Christie’s Rebecca Wei Telegraphs Chinese Rockefeller InterestChristie’s Rebecca Wei Telegraphs Chinese Rockefeller Interest
  • Here Comes the Rockefeller SaleHere Comes the Rockefeller Sale
  • What’s the Times Trying to Say About the Rockefeller Sale?What’s the Times Trying to Say About the Rockefeller Sale?
  • Rage Against the ChairRage Against the Chair
  • Hiscox 2020 Report Finds Online Sales Reach $4.8 B., Outpacing Overall Art Market PerformanceHiscox 2020 Report Finds Online Sales Reach $4.8 B., Outpacing Overall Art Market Performance
  • ArtList’s 3 Must See Shows: Art you can’t miss this week in New YorkArtList’s 3 Must See Shows: Art you can’t miss this week in New York

Filed Under: Auction Results, General Tagged With: Rockefeller

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Rare Photo Album by Dutch Street Photographer Bought at Auction by Rijksmuseum
  • Christie's Announces $70m Picasso Self Portrait
  • David Hockney's $20m Pacific Coast Highway & Santa Monica
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Phillips Includes $2.5m Norman Rockwell Painting in November Evening Sale
  • Re-discovered John Constable Painting at Sotheby's in December
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor