Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Matthew Green Implicated in Money-Laundering Scheme

March 3, 2018 by Marion Maneker

View this document on Scribd

Matthew Green resigned from his father’s art businesses six years ago, according to The Art Newspaper, and recently created a company to trade art. One of his first deals was meant to be part of an avowed money-laundering scheme, the Federal indictment (above) charges. From the court papers, Green was a terrible at money laundering because he charged very little for the huge risk he was taking and left an obvious paper trail that’s been used to indict him.

First, here’s The Art Newspaper on Green’s business:

[He is] the owner of Mayfair Fine Art Limited in London, which was established on 9 October 2017. Green is the son of the well-known London art dealer Richard Green, and was previously a director of Richard Green & Sons Holdings Ltd, Richard Green (Fine Paintings) and Richard Green & Sons Ltd, but resigned from all three directorships in December 2012, according to Companies House.

Then, in February, Green was introduced to a person looking to launder money from an illegal stock scheme. Green proposed selling the person a Picasso for £6.7m which Green would later sell to someone else and then give the person back his £6.7m minus a 5% commission.

Green doesn’t seem to know that price for laundering money is much higher than 5% which definitely isn’t worth the risk if it gets you indicted after being in business all of three months. Worse still, Green and his partners don’t seem to be the swiftest criminals. They boasted that the art market is unregulated but then created a scheme that seems to have had little to do with the art market itself.

The art sale is only one of several money-laundering venues that the person was offered. Offshore banks and real estate deals figure prominently in the indictment. What’s more, Green’s scheme could have been conducted in just about any commercial transaction. And, since the payment for the Picasso was due March 6, 2018, we’ll never know if Green was actually capable of pulling off the sale at the price he claims or would have survived any kind of audit.

Picasso painting offered in money-laundering scheme, US feds say  (The Art Newspaper)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Getting to Know the TwinsGetting to Know the Twins
  • Sotheby's Cont Evening 5/11 = $128,104,500Sotheby's Cont Evening 5/11 = $128,104,500
  • The Changing Market Mix for Impressionist and Modern Art, 2007-2017The Changing Market Mix for Impressionist and Modern Art, 2007-2017
  • Sotheby’s Foresees a Quieter Market in FebruarySotheby’s Foresees a Quieter Market in February
  • What Makes an Indian Artist Gain Value?What Makes an Indian Artist Gain Value?
  • Goodman Pushed Aside at Sotheby's AustraliaGoodman Pushed Aside at Sotheby's Australia

Filed Under: Fraud, Theft & Restitution, General

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • A Season of Improvisation: Fall 2020 New York Modern and Contemporary Art Auction Analysis
  • After Pandemic’s Rapid Change, Sotheby’s Has 8 Predictions for 2021
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • Login
  • Aboudia, Zemba Luzamba, Dickens Otieno Anchor Contemporary African Art Sale at Artcurial in Marrakesh
  • Re-discovered John Constable Painting at Sotheby's in December
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor