Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Dubious Attributions Mar Vietnamese Museum Exhibition

August 14, 2017 by Marion Maneker

A work exhibited in Ho Chi Minh City as a Ta Ty painting claimed by Thanh Chuong and confirmed by Ta Ty’s heirs

The market for Vietnamese paintings has been a hot sub-set of the South East Asian art market for some time with big sales in Hong Kong at major auction houses.

The market for Vietnamese artists has always been a bit of a caveat emptor affair but The New York Times has a wild story of a an exhibition of paintings held at The Fine Arts Museum in Ho Chi Minh City, which was paid for by the owner of 17 works of art.

During the exhibition, an artist discovered a work of his own being shown as the work of a more famous and deceased artist. He complained and the row has unravelled some more details.

Here’s the Times’s account:

The 17 paintings in the exhibition belonged to Vu Xuan Chung, a Vietnamese art dealer who said he paid the museum about $1,300 to hold the 12-day event last year. […]

After questions surfaced about the paintings, the museum quickly determined that none of the 17 paintings were created by the painters claimed by the exhibition. Museum officials apologized to the public and said they would hold the paintings for an investigation. But that never happened. Soon after, the museum quietly returned the paintings to their owner, Mr. Chung, who disputes the museum’s findings and says the paintings are authentic. He is now offering them for sale and recently sold one for more than $66,000.

All 17 paintings had been certified as genuine by a French art expert, Jean-François Hubert, a senior consultant for Vietnamese art at Christie’s. One painting still had a Christie’s tag dangling from it. Mr. Hubert appears to have had a conflict of interest. The 17 paintings had belonged to him, and he had sold them to Mr. Chung, his friend of more than 20 years, Mr. Chung said.

Vietnamese Art Has Never Been More Popular. But the Market Is Full of Fakes. (The New York Times)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • In the UK, The Path to Growth for a Regional Auction House Runs Through IndiaIn the UK, The Path to Growth for a Regional Auction House Runs Through India
  • Artist v. Artist Over Rose MuseumArtist v. Artist Over Rose Museum
  • China Guardian Parent Takes 13.5% Stake in Sotheby’sChina Guardian Parent Takes 13.5% Stake in Sotheby’s
  • February Tests Bernard Buffet’s Market MomentumFebruary Tests Bernard Buffet’s Market Momentum
  • Total & Average Prices Up at RM Sotheby’s NY SaleTotal & Average Prices Up at RM Sotheby’s NY Sale
  • Ancient Egyptian Portrait from Alsdorf Collection to Highlight Christie’s Classics WeekAncient Egyptian Portrait from Alsdorf Collection to Highlight Christie’s Classics Week

Filed Under: General

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Gorky, Kandinsky Works to Make First Public Appearance Since 1970s at Sotheby's
  • Soulages First Owned by Senegalese Poet-Politician Léopold Sédar Senghor Sells in France
  • For 2020, Phillips Brought in Total of $760.4 million, Down 16 Percent from 2019; Asia Sales Up 24 Percent
  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • After Pandemic’s Rapid Change, Sotheby’s Has 8 Predictions for 2021
  • A Season of Resilience: Fall 2020 Hong Kong Auction Analysis
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Christie's to Sell $12m Yves Klein to Benefit The Water Academy
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor