Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Algos & Art: Don’t Get Over-Excited

May 30, 2017 by Marion Maneker

Constantly in search for an empirical basis for style and taste. Won’t find it without deep culture narratives. https://t.co/qJ70hQmlqI

— William Goetzmann (@WGoetzmann) May 27, 2017

The Financial Times thinks it is being terribly clever by citing an academic paper about machine learning to suggest the art market is going to be subsumed by trading algorithms. But the journalist who wrote the story suggesting auctions for lucky license plate numbers in Hong Kong is somehow analogous to the art market didn’t bother to check with the dean of art market indices, Yale’s William Goetzmann.

Goetzmann took to Twitter over the weekend to caution the puckish journalist that value in art is far less fixed—and more subject to waxing and waning tastes—than numerical superstitions. In his tweet, above, he warned that “deep cultur[al] narratives” are hard to quantify for the purposes of predicting future price movements:

Machine-learning techniques, such as software programs for deep recurrent neural networks, have already been used to analyse and predict other auction processes. One of my favourite examples is described in a February 2017 paper by Vinci Chow, a lecturer in economics at the Chinese University of Hong Kong: “Predicting Auction Price of Vehicle License Plate with Deep Recurrent Neural Network”.

Auctioneers should read this with a chill down their spine. Chinese societies place a high value on particular “lucky” numbers or symbols, and their governments take advantage of this in selling off licence-plate numbers. The neural network described in the paper learned the patterns in these auctions, and became quite accurate at predicting their outcomes.

All very subjective, of course. Just like art collectors who will prefer a Tang horse to a Tang camel, or a Basquiat painting incorporating a skull image to one without a skull.

Art market ripe for disruption by algorithms (Financial Times)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Contemporary Art's Fine PrintContemporary Art's Fine Print
  • Art Miami, Final Day (Sales)Art Miami, Final Day (Sales)
  • Rich Families: Gold Sucks, Art RulesRich Families: Gold Sucks, Art Rules
  • Philip Hoffman Talks His Book in Basel, Claims $500m in Art Assets By End of YearPhilip Hoffman Talks His Book in Basel, Claims $500m in Art Assets By End of Year
  • Ziegler Sells Out at ArmoryZiegler Sells Out at Armory
  • Don’t Believe the Hype!Don’t Believe the Hype!

Filed Under: Economic Trends, General

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • David Hockney's $20m Pacific Coast Highway & Santa Monica
  • Rare Photo Album by Dutch Street Photographer Bought at Auction by Rijksmuseum
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • Christie's Announces $70m Picasso Self Portrait
  • How to Chant Like an Auctioneer
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Re-discovered John Constable Painting at Sotheby's in December
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor