Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Where’s Warhol? 2016 Sees 74% Market Drop

January 19, 2017 by Marion Maneker

The Warhol Market '00-'16
The Warhol Market ’00-’16

Last year, the good folks at Artnet produced data on the Warhol market for us. They were kind enough to provide us with an update from their database. The results are striking. Total sales of Warhol paintings dropped by 74% between 2015 and 2016.

There’s been a fair bit of attention paid to the fact that the auction market overall has been down 40-50% in the same period. Not only did Warhol stop acting as a motor of the art market; his sales have consistently driven the Contemporary market higher over the last decade and a half; but his market has become a significant absence.

(There’s a more detailed look at these numbers for AMMpro subscribers, below, but for those who simply want to look at this graph, above, the information is pretty clear.) Warhol sales punctuate what may have been a major market pause.

Warhol 2000-2016.001

For the sake of clarity, we broke down the sales into two periods, the run-up of the first Contemporary market boom and the post-credit crisis tangible asset boom. Looking at Warhol 2000-2009, the average yearly sales volume was $124.9m. As the chart, above, illustrates, much of that volume was concentrated in 2006-2008 (with the final year truncated by the global financial crisis.) During the marjority of those years, the total sales volume was well below the average of the entire period.

The second period presents a very different market for Warhol. From 2010 t0 2016, the average yearly sales volume was $333.8m. Although 2014 and 2015 had substantially higher sales, and reflected a bit of a boom mentality as well, yearly sales were much more in line with the average.

The chart for the second period suggests a strong market and a fairly mature market. Talking to buyers, there doesn’t seem to be an absence of demand for Warhol’s works. Much of the market constraint seems to be on the supply side. Nonetheless, the drop off of 74% is dramatic. What that fall indicates, doesn’t seem discernible at this particular moment.

Warhol 2000-2016.003

To illustrate just how striking this Warhol sellers’ strike has been, we created a 3-year moving average for the total sales volume. The moving average smooths out volatility. In this case, it further illustrates just the absence of Warhol sales in 2016.

The panic of 2009 is the only comparable drop from the 3yr moving average. But there is no similar global financial threat today.

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Warhol’s Double Elvis at Christie’s for $30mWarhol’s Double Elvis at Christie’s for $30m
  • Six Small Fright Wigs at Christie’s Provide Warhol Market TestSix Small Fright Wigs at Christie’s Provide Warhol Market Test
  • Sotheby’s Sells Jean Stein’s Art CollectionSotheby’s Sells Jean Stein’s Art Collection
  • Brillo Box (3¢ Off): A Documentary About Art CollectingBrillo Box (3¢ Off): A Documentary About Art Collecting
  • Is Tepid Hong Kong Sale of Warhol’s Mao a Sign of the Chinese Market’s Lack of Interest?Is Tepid Hong Kong Sale of Warhol’s Mao a Sign of the Chinese Market’s Lack of Interest?
  • Sotheby’s Adds $12m Mao to Hong Kong Contemporary Sale in AprilSotheby’s Adds $12m Mao to Hong Kong Contemporary Sale in April

Filed Under: Artists, Micro-markets, Premium Tagged With: Warhol

About Marion Maneker

LiveArt

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor
 

Loading Comments...