Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

The Frans Hals Revelations Cast Doubt on Both Technical Expertise and Connoisseurship

October 10, 2016 by Marion Maneker

hals-forgeryNews of Sotheby’s decision to indemnify the buyer of a Frans Hals that has been proven to Sotheby’s satisfaction as a forgery, crept out slowly over the past two weeks. Sotheby’s decision confirmed suspicions first revealed by the seizure of work bought as a Cranach the Elder painting of Venus that was reported in the press in March.

As the news broke, it was worth waiting for the comments of Bendor Grosvenor who has made a career as a dealer and now as a television presenter on the ability to discover lost works by Old Masters. Grosvenor published his impressions of the forgeries in the Financial Times this weekend. He revealed just how many experts had been convinced by the fake:

Until recently, the picture enjoyed the cleanest possible bill of health. Before the Louvre’s campaign it was subjected to a full scientific analysis by France’s Centre for Research and Restoration. It passed with flying colours. Numerous Hals scholars also supported the attribution. And in the esteemed Burlington Magazine it was described as “a very important addition to Hals’ oeuvre”.

The revelations are a very important issue. Cranach and Hals are very different artists. The forgeries are connected to still other artists, including Orazio Gentileschi, whose work is also very different. It raises the possibility of a super forger whose talent at faking paintings might go well beyond these works.

But how to protect the integrity of the Old Masters market? If the Hals passed one scientific analysis but failed another, was judged authentic by a large group of scholars and dealers, can we rely on any tools?

[I]f any of the paintings are indeed fakes, whoever has been making them is an artist of extraordinary skill. I must confess that I saw a good high-resolution photo of the Hals long before any question of forgery had been raised, and never doubted that it was genuine. The Gentileschi is the only Ruffini painting I have seen in the flesh, and for what it’s worth, I believe it is a forgery. But it took me a long time, and a flight to Berlin to see an undisputed original Gentileschi for comparison, to figure it out.

An eye for the real thing (Financial Times)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • India RisingIndia Rising
  • Dominique Lévy Doubts Art Basel 2020 Will Take Place, Says Business Is Down 90%Dominique Lévy Doubts Art Basel 2020 Will Take Place, Says Business Is Down 90%
  • Lebanese Artists Take WashingtonLebanese Artists Take Washington
  • AO Goes to FIACAO Goes to FIAC
  • Sotheby's Into IndonesiaSotheby's Into Indonesia
  • Inuit Art Dealer’s Estate Draws Global BiddingInuit Art Dealer’s Estate Draws Global Bidding

Filed Under: General

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Rare Photo Album by Dutch Street Photographer Bought at Auction by Rijksmuseum
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • David Hockney's $20m Pacific Coast Highway & Santa Monica
  • Christie's Announces $70m Picasso Self Portrait
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • How to Chant Like an Auctioneer
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Re-discovered John Constable Painting at Sotheby's in December
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor