Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

The Frans Hals Revelations Cast Doubt on Both Technical Expertise and Connoisseurship

October 10, 2016 by Marion Maneker

hals-forgeryNews of Sotheby’s decision to indemnify the buyer of a Frans Hals that has been proven to Sotheby’s satisfaction as a forgery, crept out slowly over the past two weeks. Sotheby’s decision confirmed suspicions first revealed by the seizure of work bought as a Cranach the Elder painting of Venus that was reported in the press in March.

As the news broke, it was worth waiting for the comments of Bendor Grosvenor who has made a career as a dealer and now as a television presenter on the ability to discover lost works by Old Masters. Grosvenor published his impressions of the forgeries in the Financial Times this weekend. He revealed just how many experts had been convinced by the fake:

Until recently, the picture enjoyed the cleanest possible bill of health. Before the Louvre’s campaign it was subjected to a full scientific analysis by France’s Centre for Research and Restoration. It passed with flying colours. Numerous Hals scholars also supported the attribution. And in the esteemed Burlington Magazine it was described as “a very important addition to Hals’ oeuvre”.

The revelations are a very important issue. Cranach and Hals are very different artists. The forgeries are connected to still other artists, including Orazio Gentileschi, whose work is also very different. It raises the possibility of a super forger whose talent at faking paintings might go well beyond these works.

But how to protect the integrity of the Old Masters market? If the Hals passed one scientific analysis but failed another, was judged authentic by a large group of scholars and dealers, can we rely on any tools?

[I]f any of the paintings are indeed fakes, whoever has been making them is an artist of extraordinary skill. I must confess that I saw a good high-resolution photo of the Hals long before any question of forgery had been raised, and never doubted that it was genuine. The Gentileschi is the only Ruffini painting I have seen in the flesh, and for what it’s worth, I believe it is a forgery. But it took me a long time, and a flight to Berlin to see an undisputed original Gentileschi for comparison, to figure it out.

An eye for the real thing (Financial Times)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Cohen as Cannibal: Collectors & the Power of ArtistsCohen as Cannibal: Collectors & the Power of Artists
  • Phillip Hoffman’s Charm OffensivePhillip Hoffman’s Charm Offensive
  • Christie’s Unveils $35m Twombly Leda & Swan for MayChristie’s Unveils $35m Twombly Leda & Swan for May
  • Old Home Week (in London)Old Home Week (in London)
  • Sotheby’s Mei Moses Purchase Brings Remembrance of Indices PastSotheby’s Mei Moses Purchase Brings Remembrance of Indices Past
  • Making an Impression at Sotheby'sMaking an Impression at Sotheby's

Filed Under: General

About Marion Maneker

LiveArt

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor
 

Loading Comments...