Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Knoedler, Hammer Settle with de Soles

February 10, 2016 by Marion Maneker

Rothko forgery

Artnet News’s Eileen Kinsella offers some clues to the de Sole-Knoedler settlement. Many have asked why it took four years for a settlement to come in the third week of the trial.

According to Kinsella, Knoedler’s lawyer suggests they were waiting for Ann Freedman to take her share of the responsibility for the loss:

Charles Schmerler told artnet News that it was “a fair, reasonable and good settlement,” and added that he was pleased to see the settlement with Ann Freedman, which happened this past weekend and had enabled today’s agreement.

Asked about several other pending lawsuits against Knoedler and Freedman, which allege near-identical claims, Schmerler said those cases were moving forward and that his team would continue to represent Knoedler.

As to the size of the settlement, Kinsella has this:

The De Soles, who spent $8.4 million on the painting and millions more in ensuing legal fees, were seeking $25 million.

However, in a surprising revelation that came yesterday, during testimony by former Knoedler CFO Ruth Blankschen, it was revealed that the gallery had settled a lawsuit brought by hedge fund manager Pierre LaGrange, for a fake Pollock for which he paid $17 million, for a mere $6.4 million.

Kinsella points out that the Pollock had been partially owned by another collector but it is clear Knoedler and the Hammers have been successful in reducing their exposure.

Knoedler Fraud Trial Settles (artnet News)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • More Fakes Emerge from German Forgery CaseMore Fakes Emerge from German Forgery Case
  • Jumex Shines Through Zona MacoJumex Shines Through Zona Maco
  • Fair FactsFair Facts
  • Magritte’s Market Moving UpwardMagritte’s Market Moving Upward
  • WSJ: Buyers Beguiled by Christie's MarketingWSJ: Buyers Beguiled by Christie's Marketing
  • Regrets About Warhol's MJ PortraitRegrets About Warhol's MJ Portrait

Filed Under: General

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • After Pandemic’s Rapid Change, Sotheby’s Has 8 Predictions for 2021
  • For 2020, Phillips Brought in Total of $760.4 million, Down 16 Percent from 2019; Asia Sales Up 24 Percent
  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Soulages First Owned by Senegalese Poet-Politician Léopold Sédar Senghor Sells in France
  • Gorky, Kandinsky Works to Make First Public Appearance Since 1970s at Sotheby's
  • A Season of Resilience: Fall 2020 Hong Kong Auction Analysis
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • A Season of Improvisation: Fall 2020 New York Modern and Contemporary Art Auction Analysis
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor