Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Art Market Manipulation: Can It Be Stopped?

September 28, 2015 by Marion Maneker

Matthew Day Jackson, Bucky (300-400k) 601,250GBP

Scott Reyburn has a column in the International New York Times bringing together a broad range of recent data points to ask how trustworthy are auction prices.

Mixed in are a number of different—sometimes contradictory, often familiar—points about regulation in the art market. The piece culminates with a hypothetical scenario.

The issue here is how the art market is different from other asset markets. Which isn’t a trivial issue because the question of regulation in the art market is not whether to regulate art sales—Reyburn points out there are numerous laws on the books in various jurisdictions—but how to regulate art sales. What are the rules that would bring confidence to a broader group of art buyers who may be sitting on the sidelines?

Here’s Reyburn’s scenario. As you read it, ask yourself what is to stop a real estate developer from doing the same thing in a hip, gentrifying neighborhood? For Artnet substitute real estate records and for the museum show sub in a buzzy trend piece in your preferred news outlet:

Say, for example, I discover a brilliant young artist on Facebook. After a crazy week at my house in the Hamptons, he has made 30 abstract paintings for me, which I’ve bought for a total of $90,000. Having posted examples on Instagram, I enter one of these paintings into a contemporary day sale and ask two business associates, who are cut in on the deal, to bid it up to $150,000. After the sale, a benchmark auction price posted on Artnet, and news of the artist’s inclusion in a forthcoming museum show — which happens to be curated by a friend of mine — establishes my new acquaintance as a hot young artist. Over the next six months, we discreetly sell 20 more paintings at auction and privately for an average price of $70,000 each.

A Tug of War Over Art-Sales Transparency  (The New York Times)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Freeman’s $1.4m Contemporary Auction Stars Chadwick & HoylandFreeman’s $1.4m Contemporary Auction Stars Chadwick & Hoyland
  • The Case For & Against the Barnes (Not What You Might Think)The Case For & Against the Barnes (Not What You Might Think)
  • Picasso Notebook AftermathPicasso Notebook Aftermath
  • All the Fun of the Fair, Pre-SoldAll the Fun of the Fair, Pre-Sold
  • Fond Farewell to UK Nat'l Gallery's Chief RestorerFond Farewell to UK Nat'l Gallery's Chief Restorer
  • Britain's Tate and Nat'l Gallery Agree to Play NiceBritain's Tate and Nat'l Gallery Agree to Play Nice

Filed Under: General

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • How to Chant Like an Auctioneer
  • Tracey Emin Neon Lights Up Sotheby's 'Contemporary Showcase' Pop-Up
  • Selection Bias In Art Is What Creates Value
  • Aboudia, Zemba Luzamba, Dickens Otieno Anchor Contemporary African Art Sale at Artcurial in Marrakesh
  • David Hockney's $20m Pacific Coast Highway & Santa Monica
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor