Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Australian Lawyer Stirs Pot with Hearsay Claim that 30% of Works on Australian Art Market Are Fakes

July 21, 2014 by Marion Maneker

Louise McBride and daughter

There’s a headline in today’s Sydney Morning Herald that’s getting a lot of attention and deserves some explanation and context. The headline says up to 30% of the works on the Australian art market might be fakes. But that comment is part of a lawyer’s pleading with very little to back it up in fact. Indeed, the case Francis Douglas is pleading involves Louise McBride (above with her daughter) who bought an Albert Tucker painting that unbeknown to her was once handled by a dealer who had previously sold works that were fake.

But Ms McBride has since discovered that Christies had two conflicting provenances for the painting, listing different galleries as its original source. The one referred to in the catalogue said it had been bought by a Mr Ivan O’Sullivan at the Tolarno Gallery in Melbourne in 1969 and inherited by his son, Barry.

Mr Douglas said Christies did nothing to check the provenance, and there were doubts about whether any of Christies’ experts even inspected the painting before the auction.

But soon after the sale, Christies received another version of events from Mr O’Sullivan: that it was purchased from Dominion Galleries in Sydney by his father.

Christies then consulted Melbourne University art experts after the May auction about Ms McBride’s painting and another painting after concerns were raised about whether there were several Tucker fakes on the market.

Despite advice from university experts that both works were suspect, Christies proceeded to auction the second suspect work in August that year. It has since repaid the $69,000 to Australia Club, the purchaser, the court heard.

McBride is also suing her art adviser for having undisclosed interests the sales of her works.

Supreme Court fraud case reveals corruption in art market (Sydney Morning Herald)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • London Sales Cycle Steady from 2016 at $593m, Down ~40% from 2015London Sales Cycle Steady from 2016 at $593m, Down ~40% from 2015
  • An Aura of Art Rather than ArtfulnessAn Aura of Art Rather than Artfulness
  • Christie’s Has Picasso Portrait from von FurstenbergChristie’s Has Picasso Portrait from von Furstenberg
  • Christie's London Cont Eve ResultsChristie's London Cont Eve Results
  • A Week in the Life of the PlinthA Week in the Life of the Plinth
  • Virgin Lichtenstein Girl to Sell at Sotheby’sVirgin Lichtenstein Girl to Sell at Sotheby’s

Filed Under: Fraud, Theft & Restitution

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • A Season of Improvisation: Fall 2020 New York Modern and Contemporary Art Auction Analysis
  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Login
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • Selection Bias In Art Is What Creates Value
  • Re-discovered John Constable Painting at Sotheby's in December
  • Christie's Announces $70m Picasso Self Portrait
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor