Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Finance Professors Say Art’s a Bad Investment

October 31, 2013 by Marion Maneker

Architectural-Digest-jeffrey-bilhuber-trey-laird-library-2

Two finance professors claim to have finally shown how selection bias skews the supposed returns of art through indices.

The selection bias arises when returns are based on indices built on repeat sales of fairly illiquid assets that are not sold at random. Many of the returns based on those kinds of indices—including the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices—may be biased upwards.

Not only are the returns of art lower than investors think, but also the risk is higher. Our analysis, of 20,538 paintings repeatedly sold between 1972 and 2010, found the Sharpe Ratio for art is 0.04, rather than the 0.24 that has been previously found.

Outsized returns on fine art are impressionistic, at best (Quartz)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Artelligence for November 17, 2017Artelligence for November 17, 2017
  • Christie’s Announces Rockefeller Sale for Spring 2018Christie’s Announces Rockefeller Sale for Spring 2018
  • Judd Would Have Hated MarfaJudd Would Have Hated Marfa
  • Vernissage TV: Design MiamiVernissage TV: Design Miami
  • War PaintWar Paint
  • Lord Nelson's Travel SnapsLord Nelson's Travel Snaps

Filed Under: General

About Marion Maneker

LiveArt

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor
 

Loading Comments...