Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Finance Professors Say Art’s a Bad Investment

October 31, 2013 by Marion Maneker

Architectural-Digest-jeffrey-bilhuber-trey-laird-library-2

Two finance professors claim to have finally shown how selection bias skews the supposed returns of art through indices.

The selection bias arises when returns are based on indices built on repeat sales of fairly illiquid assets that are not sold at random. Many of the returns based on those kinds of indices—including the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices—may be biased upwards.

Not only are the returns of art lower than investors think, but also the risk is higher. Our analysis, of 20,538 paintings repeatedly sold between 1972 and 2010, found the Sharpe Ratio for art is 0.04, rather than the 0.24 that has been previously found.

Outsized returns on fine art are impressionistic, at best (Quartz)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Heffel Spring Auction = C$21.8mHeffel Spring Auction = C$21.8m
  • Desperate Greeks Dream of Illicit Gains from Illegal Artifacts, Metal Detector Sales RiseDesperate Greeks Dream of Illicit Gains from Illegal Artifacts, Metal Detector Sales Rise
  • NY Cont Day Sale ChartsNY Cont Day Sale Charts
  • Did Private Sales Kill the Imp Mod Auctions?Did Private Sales Kill the Imp Mod Auctions?
  • Oliver Barker and Francis Bacon in The Front RowOliver Barker and Francis Bacon in The Front Row
  • Getty Curator's Trial Ends on Statute of LimitationsGetty Curator's Trial Ends on Statute of Limitations

Filed Under: General

About Marion Maneker

LiveArt

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor
 

Loading Comments...