Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • Contact Us
  • Podcast
  • Newsletter
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • AMMpro

Is the Art Market a Bubble? One Collector’s View

December 26, 2012 by Marion Maneker

A European collector we know writes in response to some of the recent stories about the impending burst of a presumed art market bubble:

I, for one, do not see any “bubble” as far as post-war art is concerned. What you have are basically micro-markets which are tightly controlled by a few players, or not.

I am not talking only about the Warhol or Basquiat markets, which are well known and whose inner workings are no longer mysterious. It also is the case for Fontana, Calder, Twombly and now Thiebaud, Stingler, Houseago (just some examples)…

You don’t see much when you attend an evening sale, because most of the people who make up the audience are starry-eyed gawkers. So what you get from those are mainly gossips (who presumably bought what, who presumably sold what…).

Now, if you attend a much less glamorous day-sale, that’s when you get a clearer picture. That’s when you see that the ones pushing up Calder are always the same two or three dealers. Most of the artists who make it to auction are backed by several players, collectors or dealers (auction houses in the case of second-rate Richters…) who are often heavily invested in them, but not always.

The real markets are in those sales and they do not look like bubbles at all, just business as usual. Sometimes it’s manipulated business; but frankly, who cares?

This is true for many micro-markets in the art business. There is a group of prowling  Belgian dealers, on the other hand, who will never let go of a Fontana or a Twombly if they are in the $500,000 to $1.5m price range.

Get past the small group of artists who have key players supporting the market and you get a better sense of the market. Take Philip Guston: he is not backed by anybody. So when a Guston comes to the market, be it good or average, they usually barely make the lower estimate (unless the estimate is unrealistically low), but they quietly sell.

So be it manipulated or not, beyond the evening sale bling, the market is working pretty smoothly.

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Sotheby’s Paris Art Contemporain = €19mSotheby’s Paris Art Contemporain = €19m
  • Even the Red-Hot Market for Italian Art Is Showing Rotation and ConsolidationEven the Red-Hot Market for Italian Art Is Showing Rotation and Consolidation
  • The New Gossip Game Isn’t Who Bought What, It’s Who Guaranteed WhatThe New Gossip Game Isn’t Who Bought What, It’s Who Guaranteed What
  • The Mona Lisa of Brazilian Modernism Destroyed by FireThe Mona Lisa of Brazilian Modernism Destroyed by Fire
  • Buyer of Basquiat and $80m in Works RevealedBuyer of Basquiat and $80m in Works Revealed
  • SFMOMA Set to Open with Blue Chip Blow OutSFMOMA Set to Open with Blue Chip Blow Out
  • Print
  • Tweet

Filed Under: General

Advertise on Art Market Monitor with Nectar Ads

Top Posts

  • Why I Am Leaving Gagosian
  • The New York Times Still Doesn't Get Art & Money Laundering
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Bonhams Brings Second Generation of Modern Vietnamese Art in Hong Kong
  • David Hockney's $20m Pacific Coast Highway & Santa Monica
  • Newsletter
  • Sotheby's Brings $30m Pollock to New York
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Christie's Announces $70m Picasso Self Portrait
  • How Park West Sold $93m in Peter Max Paintings


  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • Art Loans
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Advertise on Art Market Monitor