Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Has Success Spoiled the Art Market, Pt. 2

December 14, 2012 by Marion Maneker

Credit: Art Observed

Roberta Smith publishes her own worrisome piece on how the success of the global art market—through the channel of the international art fair—has stifled local art. To Smith, the local gallery scene in New York had lost its vigor even before the setback of Hurricane Sandy. Sixty years before, New York wrested the title of capital of the art world from Paris. Today, the global art market has moved away, not to another city but to another dimension:

The machine driving this expansion — a sparkling sphere of money, shiny art and shiny people — hovers like a giant, top-heavy spaceship above what I consider the serious art world, where real art comes from. You see it when you pick up the equally shiny art magazines. But unless you’re one of the players actually involved in buying or selling, it remains remote, a world unto itself. Sometimes it seems as if it could just take off — with all its bling, astounding prices and show-off collectors and climbers — and park in some other part of the art galaxy, there to thrive or collapse of its own accord.

But that’s probably not going to happen. The fairs in particular have become an essential fact of the lives and livelihoods of art galleries of all kinds, not just the blue-chip ones catered to by the various Basel and Frieze iterations. Attending several art fairs a year, mainly in the United States and Europe, is now what many galleries do, even the fledgling ones on the Lower East Side. It is how they sell art, make contacts and establish their bona fides with dealers from other cities. But as dealers stretch themselves thinner and thinner, it is inevitable that local art scenes will pay a price. […]

I found myself walking around a lot this fall thinking that people need to do better. There were too many vacant-looking, phoned-in exhibitions by artists from all over the world, shows that looked like something art dealers were doing to kill time between fairs. And there were moments when galleries seemed to be trying to fight back with immense, festivalist art-fair extravaganzas.
Art Fairs Full of Bling, If Not Fire (New York Times)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Christie's Plants a Flag: Auction Market BottomedChristie's Plants a Flag: Auction Market Bottomed
  • Frieze Warm-Up: Smaller GalleriesFrieze Warm-Up: Smaller Galleries
  • National Gallery Gets Its Bagpiper BackNational Gallery Gets Its Bagpiper Back
  • A Question of KnowledgeA Question of Knowledge
  • Felix Salmon Doesn't Like Art FundsFelix Salmon Doesn't Like Art Funds
  • Varney UnveilsVarney Unveils

Filed Under: General

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Christie's Announces $70m Picasso Self Portrait
  • Mark Rothko, Tamara de Lempicka, Mickalene Thomas to Star in Phillips London Evening Sale
  • How to Chant Like an Auctioneer
  • Basquiat's Last Girlfriend
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • David Hockney's $20m Pacific Coast Highway & Santa Monica
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor