Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

‘Presumably Michelangelo Had Some Form of Agent.’

September 23, 2012 by Marion Maneker

Art in America’s Brian Boucher talks to Michael Findlay about his book, The Value of Art:

BRIAN BOUCHER You point out that the profession of art dealer has only come into existence in the last 150 years. Do you ever stop yourself and remember that you’re in a job your great-grandfather maybe couldn’t have conceived of?

MICHAEL FINDLAY  It’s really only so new in its present form. But there have always been people who have brokered deals for artists. Presumably Michelangelo had some form of agent.

More striking than that, to me, is how very different being an art dealer is today from what it was when I entered the business. Dealers are more to the fore, although they were always a colorful part of the art world, if you think about people like Betty Parsons. But they were characters in an Off-Off-Broadway production rather than players on the world cultural stage.

BOUCHER You point out possible future global shifts in the art market, led by the great growth in numbers of “high net worth individuals” in Asia, and the need for masterpieces to hang in the new art museums of the Middle East. What changes does that bring to the art trade?

FINDLAY The volume of funds available is staggering, as well as the global nature of the art market. While there were for instance German manufacturing tycoons buying contemporary American art in the ‘60s, that was about as global as you got. Occasionally one or two prescient Japanese collectors were buying in Paris and New York.

BOUCHER  How is art collecting viewed differently today?

FINDLAY It seems to me that the notion of collecting art as part of a lifestyle is new. It’s integrated into a platform of multiple homes and a type of glamorized life. Whereas I think the collectors I became aware of when I entered this business led quite quiet lives, Bob and Ethel Scull notwithstanding. Not because of secrecy but because people weren’t interested.

Michael Findlay on the Value of Looking (Art in America)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Robert Indiana Dies Amid Controversy Over His WorkRobert Indiana Dies Amid Controversy Over His Work
  • When Nicholas Met Michael . . . When Nicholas Met Michael . . .
  • Christie’s to Offer $8.1 M. Magritte in London Leg of Marquee July SaleChristie’s to Offer $8.1 M. Magritte in London Leg of Marquee July Sale
  • Armory Show Shuffles DealersArmory Show Shuffles Dealers
  • Has Govan Got the Money?Has Govan Got the Money?
  • An Aura of Art Rather than ArtfulnessAn Aura of Art Rather than Artfulness

Filed Under: General

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • David Hockney's $20m Pacific Coast Highway & Santa Monica
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Phillips to Showcase Helen Frankenthaler at Southampton Outpost
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Re-discovered John Constable Painting at Sotheby's in December
  • Christie's Announces $70m Picasso Self Portrait
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • How to Chant Like an Auctioneer
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor