Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Who Minds the Art Market? Scholars

February 9, 2012 by Marion Maneker

The Art Newspaper kindly asked me to write something about the effect of the Knoedler case that caused such a flurry of worry last December. You’ll remember that it came out Knoedler had been involved in the sale of a number of dubious works by giants of American modernism like Motherwell, Pollock and Diebenkorn. The specific question was whether this case would renew calls for regulation in the art market.

The piece tries to point out that galleries and dealers are already regulated by the commercial laws but the contributing factors in these stories is something that government cannot easily regulate. Take the diffusion of responsibility that comes with the growing number of intermediaries involved in secondary market deals:

While intermediaries are not necessarily a sign of trouble, the chain of people involved in the Lagrange case seems to have created a diffusion of responsibility. The situation is not atypical. “There used to be clear pipelines that art would go into, but now there is a complex matrix,” says David Houston, the director of the curatorial department at the Crystal Bridges Museum. The institution has made no secret of its desire to buy a major Pollock, but is navigating busy waters. “We see a lot more middlemen in the market today than we did ten years ago—people who are part-adviser, part-dealer and part-picker,” he says.

More to the point, I think the regulation question is misdirected. Art’s ultimate value is not economic. Unlike debt vehicles, real property or equities, there is no independent way to measure value and regulate trading. Scholars, not accountants, police the art market. Increasingly, those scholars are feeling threatened by art owners who bully them into keeping negative opinions to themselves.

Ultimately, the best way to protect the art market—and address the issue of regulation—is to safeguard scholarship: this underpins an artists’ value, provides proof of provenance and lubricates an expanding market. As the art business continues to globalise, its growth depends upon making scholarship reliable and accessible. Because, in the end, the experts are the only candidates who can provide the adult supervision the market desperately craves.

Art market analysis: A market in need of supervision (The Art Newspaper)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Ooooh, It's the Ferrari FundOoooh, It's the Ferrari Fund
  • Collector Discovers Artist Who Is All Over InstagramCollector Discovers Artist Who Is All Over Instagram
  • Americana ComingAmericana Coming
  • Unwinding the Marcos Art HoardUnwinding the Marcos Art Hoard
  • Peter Halley to Take Over Lever House on Park AvenuePeter Halley to Take Over Lever House on Park Avenue
  • Sotheby’s NY Impressionist-Modern Evening Sale = $306.7mSotheby’s NY Impressionist-Modern Evening Sale = $306.7m

Filed Under: Featured, General

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • David Hockney's $20m Pacific Coast Highway & Santa Monica
  • Christie's to Sell $12m Yves Klein to Benefit The Water Academy
  • Christie's Announces $70m Picasso Self Portrait
  • How to Chant Like an Auctioneer
  • Re-discovered John Constable Painting at Sotheby's in December
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor