Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Dealers v. Auction Houses: Reserves & Guarantees

November 27, 2011 by Marion Maneker

The Economist—which ought be reliable when it comes to understanding the ways in which markets function—published two weeks ago yet another conspiracy-loving take on the Fall New York auctions. We commented on the essay here pointing out that the auction houses are the seller’s agent, not the buyer’s and their guarantees, secret reserves and bidding on behalf of the seller were actions in service of their clients.

An interested party sympathetic to the auction houses responded with these further thoughts:

The buyers—almost all trade (or the collectors they represent)—all know each other and don’t like being forced to compete instead of letting a work get bought in and figuring it out later.

The sellers—so often tax-paying estates or non-profits—are the ones who need the third party option or they are forced to sell privately or in a thinly traded auction market where they could be forced to sell for nothing. All of this invocation of “Free Market” by the trade associations for dealers is just about removing systems (reserves, house bidding on behalf of the consignor, third parties) that are consumer protection against the “intimate” trade.

Furthermore, if the trade does welcome increased transparency in the market, it should adopt disclosure policies in line with the auction houses with respect to restitution, transactions with related parties and interrelated financial interests. These same rules that already apply to auctions should apply to private dealerships and, critically, to the Art Fairs where one can see the private sale market in full, unregulated and consumer-unprotected glory.

Perhaps the ADAA will vote for enactment before Miami Basel this week?

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Two Abstracts Get Flipped; One Rises 70% in 18 Months; the Other Falls 11% in 30 Months. Why?Two Abstracts Get Flipped; One Rises 70% in 18 Months; the Other Falls 11% in 30 Months. Why?
  • Bailed Out ArtBailed Out Art
  • Placing Emphasis on 20th Century, Art Basel Details Second Online Viewing RoomPlacing Emphasis on 20th Century, Art Basel Details Second Online Viewing Room
  • Sotheby's HK 20th C Chinese = HK$235,892,750Sotheby's HK 20th C Chinese = HK$235,892,750
  • Sotheby’s Announces Gunther Sachs Single-Owner SaleSotheby’s Announces Gunther Sachs Single-Owner Sale
  • Sir Nicholas: For and AgainstSir Nicholas: For and Against

Filed Under: Featured, General

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Lost Lempicka Discovered at Sotheby's
  • $10 M. Picasso Portrait Unseen for Decades to Sell at Bonhams
  • Vienna Secession Painting, Long Thought to Be Lost, Sets a Record at Auction
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Collection of Texas Heiress Anne Marion Expected to Fetch $150 M. at Sotheby’s
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Selection Bias In Art Is What Creates Value
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor