Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Leonardo By the Book

September 29, 2011 by Marion Maneker

It’s been very quiet in the world of the lost Leonardo that scholar Martin Kemp believes is a genuine Leonardo. It has sold in recent years for five figures but would be worth nine if the attribution sticks. For a while, authenticators claimed to have found Leonardo’s fingerprint on the work until David Grann demolished that expert’s reputation in the New Yorker. Now Kemp is back with further proof that he says nails the authenticity, according to the Guardian:

“Assertions that it is a forgery, a pastiche, or a copy of a lost Leonardo are all effectively eliminated,” Kemp told the Guardian. Earlier this year, he embarked on what he describes as a “needle-in-a-haystack” search for a 15th-century volume with a missing sheet. A clue lay in the stitch-holes along the portrait’s left-hand margin, suggesting it had been torn from a luxury-bound volume. But the chances of this volume surviving 500 years were remote, and the chances of it being found even remoter.

Against the odds, Kemp tracked the volume down, to Poland’s national library in Warsaw; the stitch-holes are a perfect match for those on La Bella Principessa, a portrait in ink and coloured chalks on vellum. It is overwhelming evidence, Kemp says, that the portrait dates from the 15th century – and not the 19th century, as Christie’s thought when it sold it in 1998 for £11,400 (it could fetch £100m as a Leonardo).

Kemp travelled to Warsaw with a specialist who has undertaken scientific analysis of the Mona Lisa, scanning beneath paint layers. Recalling the moment they opened the volume, Kemp says: “Yes, lo and behold, we could identify that there was a page clearly removed. The stitch-holes matched, the vellum matched. It is indeed 1496, it is indeed Bianca and indeed for her marriage. It’s uncanny. You could say: ‘Stitch holes are always the same distance apart.’ But the irregular stitching was spaced by eye, not precisely measured.”

Is This Portrait a Lost Leonardo? (Guardian)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Daily Mail Says Regional Rivalry Drove Leonardo BiddingDaily Mail Says Regional Rivalry Drove Leonardo Bidding
  • Yes, It’s a Leonardo. Stop Calling It a Fake.Yes, It’s a Leonardo. Stop Calling It a Fake.
  • Is the Leonardo Record a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy for Salvator Mundi’s Fame?Is the Leonardo Record a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy for Salvator Mundi’s Fame?
  • Brooke Lampley on Leonardo Buyer’s ToleranceBrooke Lampley on Leonardo Buyer’s Tolerance
  • Watch Salvator Mundi Become the Most Expensive Work of Art SoldWatch Salvator Mundi Become the Most Expensive Work of Art Sold
  • This Is What the Buyer of the Leonardo Is Paying ForThis Is What the Buyer of the Leonardo Is Paying For

Filed Under: Artists, General Tagged With: Leonardo

About Marion Maneker

LiveArt

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor
 

Loading Comments...