Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Goldmanites Hate Their Art

December 8, 2009 by Marion Maneker

Mehretu painting at GoldmanThe folks at Clusterstock have been covering an interesting twist on the whole art and finance connection. Though hedgies continue to be the mythical beast that drives the Contemporary art market, it would seem that the well-rewarded employees of Goldman Sachs are finnicky about their art. They also seem a little unrealistic about its value.

There are two different works at issue. One is a Franz Ackermann mural that’s upsetting employees; the other is a Julie Mehretu painting. Here’s what Clusterstock says about the mural:

Nobody is happy with the $10 million mural Goldman has painted on the wall of their new lobby. Goldman employees recently moved into their new building on 200 West Street in Battery Park and apparently all anyone who walks in can talk about is how much they dislike the mural. It spans the entire back wall of the large lobby and spills onto a side wall where it’s in front of employees as they scan their ID cards. It’s inescapable until they reach the elevators.

The mural is exceptionally large but that price seems somewhat inflated considering Ackermann’s highest auction price is $500,000 for a work that is nearly 10-ft. wide. Yes, artworks can be values by size but the price ought not to scale at a consistent rate.

The second work, by Mehretu. Her highest auction price was set in June of this year in London for a smidge below $400,000.

Turns out Goldman Sachs wasted another $5 million on this painting, on display in their other entrance and visible from the street. Nobody thinks this one is any good either. […] Julie Mehretu’s piece is meant to show the history of global trade capital and commerce, but she has not yet decided what to call it.

To be fair, auction prices are never a consistent gauge of dealer prices. Are Goldman employees over-estimating the value of their firms art out of outrage or pride. It’s hard to tell.

Update: According to Calvin Tomkins’s March, 2010 story about the Goldman mural, it did indeed cost $5m. Fabrication costs consumed $4m of the commission. Still, that’s a big number.

Goldman Paid $10 Million for a Mural that All the Employees Hate (Clusterstock)

More Bad News About Goldman’s New Art (Clusterstock)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Artelligence for May 2, 2018Artelligence for May 2, 2018
  • The Smell of Money in the Desert HeatThe Smell of Money in the Desert Heat
  • The Surprising $120m Jeff Koons SculptureThe Surprising $120m Jeff Koons Sculpture
  • Vernissage TV: Giacometti at Fondation BeyelerVernissage TV: Giacometti at Fondation Beyeler
  • Vernissage TV: Danish PavillionVernissage TV: Danish Pavillion
  • Who Bought the Bradford?Who Bought the Bradford?

Filed Under: General

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • 14th-Century Painting to Sell at Auction Under Restitution Settlement with German-Jewish Art Historian’s Heir
  • David Hockney's $20m Pacific Coast Highway & Santa Monica
  • Phillips Includes $2.5m Norman Rockwell Painting in November Evening Sale
  • Paris's Artcurial Reports $180.5 M. in Sales for 2020, Online Sales Volume Up 59 Percent
  • Basquiat's Last Girlfriend
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor