Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Is Craftsmanship Beauty?

October 17, 2009 by Marion Maneker

The New York Times had an interesting op-ed yesterday that argues what lasts, long after the concept of a piece of art has died with the culture that carried it, is an appreciation for skill. Dennis Dutton, a professor of the philosophy of art in New Zealand, argues that the ancient human need is for the bravura:

one trait of the ancestral personality persists in our aesthetic cravings: the pleasure we take in admiring skilled performances. From Lascaux to the Louvre to Carnegie Hall — where now and again the Homo erectus hairs stand up on the backs of our necks — human beings have a permanent, innate taste for virtuoso displays in the arts.

We ought, then, to stop kidding ourselves that painstakingly developed artistic technique is passé, a value left over from our grandparents’ culture. Evidence is all around us. Even when we have lost contact with the social or religious ideas behind the arts of bygone civilizations, we are still able, as with the great bronzes or temples of Greece or ancient China, to respond directly to craftsmanship. The direct response to skill is what makes it possible to find beauty in many tribal arts even though we often know nothing about the beliefs of the people who created them. There is no place on earth where superlative technique in music and dance is not regarded as beautiful.

The appreciation of contemporary conceptual art, on the other hand, depends not on immediately recognizable skill, but on how the work is situated in today’s intellectual zeitgeist. That’s why looking through the history of conceptual art after Duchamp reminds me of paging through old New Yorker cartoons. Jokes about Cadillac tailfins and early fax machines were once amusing, and the same can be said of conceptual works like Piero Manzoni’s 1962 declaration that Earth was his art work, Joseph Kosuth’s 1965 “One and Three Chairs” (a chair, a photo of the chair and a definition of “chair”) or Mr. Hirst’s medicine cabinets. Future generations, no longer engaged by our art “concepts” and unable to divine any special skill or emotional expression in the work, may lose interest in it as a medium for financial speculation and relegate it to the realm of historical curiosity.

In this respect, I can’t help regarding medicine cabinets, vacuum cleaners and dead sharks as reckless investments. Somewhere out there in collectorland is the unlucky guy who will be the last one holding the vacuum cleaner, and wondering why.

He may be right about persistence of talent but that doesn’t negate value. One of the reasons objects are valuable is for their historical importance and rarity. Why would a copy of an ancient document be valuable–and many are–when the skill and craftsmanship is not in the object but in the words or concepts embedded there? It’s because of the historical importance. The same is true of medicine cabinets, vacuum cleaners and sharks (not to mention a lot of pictures that are more valuable because of their art historical importance that their prima facie beauty.)

Has Conceptual Art Jumped the Shark Tank? (NYTimes)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Getty Museum Buys Gentilischi for $30.5m, Reunites Painting with One of Two Other WorksGetty Museum Buys Gentilischi for $30.5m, Reunites Painting with One of Two Other Works
  • Headlined by Salman Toor, Phillips $5.1 M. London New Now Sale Reaches New HighHeadlined by Salman Toor, Phillips $5.1 M. London New Now Sale Reaches New High
  • Andreas Gursky Needs a BreakAndreas Gursky Needs a Break
  • Sotheby's Chinese WoA Makes $15,107,375Sotheby's Chinese WoA Makes $15,107,375
  • The Charm of a Career at Christie'sThe Charm of a Career at Christie's
  • Jopling: Art Shouldn’t Chase MoneyJopling: Art Shouldn’t Chase Money

Filed Under: General

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Rare Photo Album by Dutch Street Photographer Bought at Auction by Rijksmuseum
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • David Hockney's $20m Pacific Coast Highway & Santa Monica
  • Christie's Announces $70m Picasso Self Portrait
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • How to Chant Like an Auctioneer
  • Re-discovered John Constable Painting at Sotheby's in December
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor