Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Titling at Hirst

October 14, 2009 by Marion Maneker

Mark Hudson, writing in the Telegraph, makes a bold claim about the over-covered Hirst exhibition at the Wallace Collection:

This week we may have witnessed one of the pivotal moments in the history of art. Not only has Damien Hirst, arguably the richest and most powerful artist in history, received the critical pasting of his life, but there’s a sense that our whole perception of what art is, or should be, may have subtly – or not so subtly – shifted.

Unfortunately, that’s the lead of the story, not the conclusion, and the rest returns to the boring and impotent anger at Hirst’s lack of skills. Without engaging in the question of whether Hirst’s work will survive the global credit boom, the notion that our idea of what art is, or should be, has shifted seems grandiose and premature.

Richard Lacayo at Time Magazine does a better job of situating Hirst. The artist showed him some transparencies when Lacayo was writing a profile last Summer:

They didn’t look very promising but I didn’t offer any judgments about them then and I won’t offer any now. You can’t make final judgments based on reproductions or transparencies. But I do remember thinking that when he finally exhibited them he was probably going to be slaughtered by the critics in London, who had gotten thoroughly sick of those endless dot and butterfly paintings being churned out in his name by his assistants, to say nothing of that diamond encrusted skull.

I was pretty sick of all that, too, but I was also sort of moved by Hirst’s predicament. He had become one of the most successful artists in the world without painting anything himself, but at the age of 43 he felt he needed to work in the great tradition to feel validated. It reminded me of the way Billy Joel and Paul McCartney keep trying to write classical music.

But we’re interested in knowing what others think? Has Damien Hirst pushed too far and damaged his reputation?

It Couldn’t Get Worse for Damien Hirst (Telegraph)

Damien Hirst: Dead on Arrival (Time)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Don’t Blame the Met Not Being Able to Increase Its $6 Per Visitor Revenue StreamDon’t Blame the Met Not Being Able to Increase Its $6 Per Visitor Revenue Stream
  • Ned Kelly Only Bright Spot in Sotheby's Australia OpenNed Kelly Only Bright Spot in Sotheby's Australia Open
  • Where’s Warhol? 2016 Sees 74% Market DropWhere’s Warhol? 2016 Sees 74% Market Drop
  • Met Cuts 14% of StaffMet Cuts 14% of Staff
  • Defending OCMADefending OCMA
  • The Shiraga Story Starts with a Cadre of CollectorsThe Shiraga Story Starts with a Cadre of Collectors

Filed Under: Artists

About Marion Maneker

LiveArt

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor