Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

How Photogs Lost Rights to Polaroid

September 24, 2009 by Marion Maneker

The Boston Globe‘s Alex Beam delves into the Polaroid sale question and reveals some interesting details on how the collection came to be up for sale. At issue is the somewhat unconventional nature of the collection where many of the works were not given to the corporation entirely. That means many photographers–assuming the corporation would never sell the works–only gave rights to the image, not ownership of the actual photograph:

The original Polaroid company went bankrupt in 2002. A group of Minnesota-based investors bought its assets, including the photo collection. Then they declared bankruptcy. This summer their creditors asked a judge if they could sell the photos, and the judge approved. He ruled, and Sotheby’s asserts, that the creditors have “free and clear’’ ownership of the collection.

If the photographers wanted to claim their work, he said, they should have acted in 2002, during the first bankruptcy proceedings. “That is when the contractual rights may have been voided,’’ says photography critic Allan Coleman, who has been bird-dogging the fate of the collection on his blog PhotoCritic International.

Rough justice, to be sure. The facts behind the case are devilishly complex. Polaroid signed many different agreements with many different photographers. For instance, Ansel Adams and Land experimented with film starting in the 1940s, and Adams gave his work outright to the company. On the other hand, many photographers signed an agreement which stipulated that “Collection images are exclusively used for exhibition and editorial (non-commercial) purposes with Polaroid retaining all rights.’’

At various times during Polaroid’s roiled recent history, staffers approached Harvard’s Fogg Museum and the Whitney Museum in New York, seeking a home for the photos. One roadblock was money. It costs an estimated $200,000 a year just to warehouse the photos in Somerville. And stiffed creditors couldn’t be expected to overlook the multimillion-dollar value of the collection.

Through the Lens of Time (Boston Globe)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Understanding the Abu Dhabi Art FairUnderstanding the Abu Dhabi Art Fair
  • Not Interested in Naked BruniNot Interested in Naked Bruni
  • ABMiami: Toning Down & Spreading OutABMiami: Toning Down & Spreading Out
  • Gagosian: New York's Dominance WaningGagosian: New York's Dominance Waning
  • 2 x 200 Wants You to Own Art2 x 200 Wants You to Own Art
  • How to Make Your Art an InvestmentHow to Make Your Art an Investment

Filed Under: Photography Tagged With: Featured

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • After Pandemic’s Rapid Change, Sotheby’s Has 8 Predictions for 2021
  • For 2020, Phillips Brought in Total of $760.4 million, Down 16 Percent from 2019; Asia Sales Up 24 Percent
  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • A Season of Resilience: Fall 2020 Hong Kong Auction Analysis
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Soulages First Owned by Senegalese Poet-Politician Léopold Sédar Senghor Sells in France
  • A Season of Improvisation: Fall 2020 New York Modern and Contemporary Art Auction Analysis
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Christie's Announces $70m Picasso Self Portrait
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor