Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Alternative History of Cranach's Adam & Eve

August 24, 2009 by Marion Maneker

Suzanne Muchnic of the Los Angeles Times uses the occasion of the recent appellate court ruling on the Norton Simon Museum’s Cranach paintings to re-tell the convoluted story of their provenance. The official version is that the pictures were seized by the Bolsheviks from the Stroganoff family and sold to Jacques Gouldstikker who in turn had to flee the Netherlands when the Nazis invaded. His property was taken by Goering. The Stroganoff’s made claims after the war and received the Cranachs as restitution whereupon they sold them to Norton Simon.

The current dispute comes from one of Gouldstikker’s heirs who received other works as restitution but not the ones taken by Goering. (Got that? If not, read the story.) Here’s the alternative view of the chain of ownership:

The “Adam” and “Eve” pair has been a fixture in Pasadena for decades. But as Holocaust restitution research has escalated, a sketchy alternate version of their history has emerged. Unearthed documents indicate that the Cranachs were hidden in several locations in Kiev from 1919 to 1929, when they were sent to Leningrad in preparation for the Berlin auction.

No one disputes that the paintings were sold in the Stroganoff auction. But a case study in the American Assn. of Museums’ Guide to Provenance Research concludes that the Cranachs were among works from various sources added to the sale to give them a “noble” provenance and disguise the fact that they were actually being sold by the government.

There is no evidence that the Cranachs belonged to the Stroganoffs, said Amy Walsh, curator of Dutch and Flemish paintings and head of provenance research at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, and one of three authors of the AAM guide. But many questions remain about the ownership of the paintings.

The Norton Simon Museum is Battling to Keep Adam and Eve (Los Angeles Times)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Grotjahn v. Kassay: A Tale of the TapeGrotjahn v. Kassay: A Tale of the Tape
  • Meet the French SaatchiMeet the French Saatchi
  • Global Art Flow Could Be Disrupted By Potential Sotheby's Art Handlers StrikeGlobal Art Flow Could Be Disrupted By Potential Sotheby's Art Handlers Strike
  • The Australian Art Market ConsolidatesThe Australian Art Market Consolidates
  • Zeng Fanzhi Sets a RecordZeng Fanzhi Sets a Record
  • London's ICA on the RocksLondon's ICA on the Rocks

Filed Under: Fraud, Theft & Restitution

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • After Pandemic’s Rapid Change, Sotheby’s Has 8 Predictions for 2021
  • For 2020, Phillips Brought in Total of $760.4 million, Down 16 Percent from 2019; Asia Sales Up 24 Percent
  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • A Season of Resilience: Fall 2020 Hong Kong Auction Analysis
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Soulages First Owned by Senegalese Poet-Politician Léopold Sédar Senghor Sells in France
  • A Season of Improvisation: Fall 2020 New York Modern and Contemporary Art Auction Analysis
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Christie's Announces $70m Picasso Self Portrait
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor