Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

This Bassman Moment

July 16, 2009 by Marion Maneker

Ginia Bellafante writes an incomparable description of Lillian Bassman’s work in the New York Times. A show in Litchfield County is the pretext but the subtext is the growing interest in Bassman’s work from scholars and collectors. Here are some excerpts from the story:

Lillian BassmanIn the early 1970s Lillian Bassman, among the most important fashion photographers of the 20th century, made the decision to dispose of her career, quite literally. Artists do this all the time without the intent — giving themselves over to excess, retreating to ashrams — but Ms. Bassman’s approach was aggressive and determined. Disillusioned by the costuming of the late 1960s, she had had enough of fashion and expressed her disdain by destroying decades’ worth of negatives and placing others in a trash bag in the coal room of her Upper East Side carriage house. Her era of furtive eroticism was over, and there was no point in scrapbooking it. […]

At the same time that she was turning out editorial work Ms. Bassman was having a considerable impact on advertising, photographing lingerie for Warner’s and other purveyors in a manner that abandoned the pharmaceutical aesthetic that then prevailed in the industry’s marketing. (These pictures form a large part of the show at KMR.) In place of heavy-set women constraining themselves in what was essentially equipment, Ms. Bassman deployed immeasurably lithe models, conveying a world in which women seemed to linger in the pleasures of their own sensuality. In her eye the undergarment emerges as a wardrobe unto itself, as if anything else in a woman’s closet were simply an imposition. […]

Picture 12In the period dominated by Avedon and Irving Penn, Ms. Bassman was one of the few female photographers in the fashion business, and her work had a distinctly different cast from the outset, one less distancing. In most of the lingerie pictures, for example, the faces are averted or obscured, the result of the Ford agency’s insistence that its models not be identifiable in such provocative advertising. The effect of this constraint is not cold anonymity but an unusual intimacy that leaves the images feeling almost entirely divorced from commodity, as if they were the visual entries in the personal journals of the women photographed.

Feminity, Salvaged (New York Times)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Man Ray Makes a $3m Record in ParisMan Ray Makes a $3m Record in Paris
  • Phillips NY Photography = $8.35mPhillips NY Photography = $8.35m
  • Eggleston Collector to Photographer: Your Contemporary Art Prints Dilute My ValueEggleston Collector to Photographer: Your Contemporary Art Prints Dilute My Value
  • Phillips de Pury NY Photography = $6.9mPhillips de Pury NY Photography = $6.9m
  • Sotheby’s NY Photography = $4.75mSotheby’s NY Photography = $4.75m
  • Christie's Avedon Auction = €5,467,250Christie's Avedon Auction = €5,467,250

Filed Under: Artists Tagged With: Featured, Photography

About Marion Maneker

LiveArt

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor
 

Loading Comments...