Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Arne Glimcher's View of the World

May 12, 2009 by Marion Maneker

Pace/Wildenstein founder Arne Glimcher has a commentary on the art market on the DailyBeast.com today. What he wants to say about the art market isn’t entirely clear. But let’s go through some of his points and see if we can make sense of them. After all, what Glimcher knows about the art market is valuable.

Is Glimcher sincere in this comment on the small auction catalogues? Few commenters have expressed an expectation of strong sales, even distressed sales. Or is this a straw man?

For one thing, everyone expected an avalanche of art to come to market—especially from the collections of hedge-fund guys and real-estate moguls whose fortunes dissolved even more rapidly than they were made. We anticipated auction catalogs stacked liked skyscrapers, but we were wrong.

Glimcher tells us that owners of important works (not the art bought be strapped hedgies and real estate-niks mentioned above, one presumes) avoid the auction houses–especially now that guarantees are gone–to prevent any feelers for a sale from tainting the work’s eventual value:

The fact that art auctions are only a part of the art market is rarely acknowledged. Consequently, more collectors are often selling through dealers, where the work is shown privately to few clients and the sale is made without “burning” the painting. The art gallery market in total far exceeds the auction market annually, but you don’t read about it in the papers.

At the same time, the art world seems incapable of keeping a secret. Few buyers work with only one dealer and knowledge is the coin of the art world. So it is very hard to keep an offered work a secret with the army of private dealers, art advisors and other operatives all talking about what’s available.

Finally, Glimcher closes with a cautionary tale of a Jeff Koons Cracked Egg sculpture bought be a collector for $2 million but unsuited to the collectors new home. It was sold back to the dealer–you know who–who subsequently sold it to a “Russian” for $22 million. Glimcher blames this sort of vertiginous pricing on the auction prices for the Koons’s work. And he’s got a good point there.

Will the Auction Houses Get Hammered (DailyBeast.com)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • LVMH Foundation Moved the Richter MarketLVMH Foundation Moved the Richter Market
  • Pappajohn Donates to Des MoinesPappajohn Donates to Des Moines
  • Tight Squeeze for LichtensteinTight Squeeze for Lichtenstein
  • And Just Like That: The Art Market is Fine AgainAnd Just Like That: The Art Market is Fine Again
  • Aboriginals at the MetAboriginals at the Met
  • Christie’s Offers Restituted Cranach in AprilChristie’s Offers Restituted Cranach in April

Filed Under: Dealers

About Marion Maneker

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

Top Posts

  • Keith Haring’s 1989 Retrospect Comes to Sotheby’s London Prints Sale
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • Four of Picasso's Women Valued at $28m Come to Christie's from Rose-Walters Collection
  • Restituted Van Gogh Portrait from London Collection to Sell at Christie’s
  • Roy Lichtenstein’s Top Ten Auction Prices
  • Norman Rockwell's Not Gay. But Is He a Great Artist?
  • Christie’s to Sell Its First Fully Digital Work of Art in Test of Emerging Market
  • Basquiat's Last Girlfriend
  • Podcast
  • How to Chant Like an Auctioneer
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor