Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • Contact Us
  • Podcast
  • Newsletter
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • AMMpro

Some Questions About the Rose

January 29, 2009 by Marion Maneker

Tyler Green has an interview with the director of the Rose Museum, Michael Rush, that raises some interesting questions. Rush is adamant that the Rose is financially independent of the university and closing the museum is merely an excuse to liquidate the art as an asset.

The Rose is not in financial trouble. We’re secure. I can’t say that strongly enough. We’re meeting our fundraising goals. We’re doing fine. We have a tight managerial structure. We’re utterly responsible. There’s no trouble for the Rose.

This is all about selling the artwork. If the university gives any indication that they’re selling the Rose to save money, that’s untrue. They’re just selling the artwork. The university doesn’t give us a penny. We are financially autonomous within the university. They don’t pay our salaries or anything, just below-the-line costs like the heat and the lights. That’s not going to change if they get rid of us – they’re going to use the building for something else, and they’ll have those same costs.

So this does not change their equation economically at all. In fact it hurts them: Not only do they not give us any cash, all of our income is ‘taxed’ at 15 percent. We actually pay them. So they’re losing the 15 percent that we raise that they take off the top of our hard-earned money. And believe me, it’s hard-earned.

MAN: You mentioned earlier in our conversation that the Rose had an endowment that, at its peak was at $20 million and that it’s down about 25 percent because of the recent market drop. The Rose’s donors gave that money to the Rose, not to Brandeis. So if Brandeis closes the Rose, does Brandeis essentially ‘steal’ that money?

MR: I don’t know what to say about that. If the Rose is closed, yeah, the university would take it over.

Their due diligence will involve examination of all the endowments and the intentions of the endowment, the ones that are restricted. Many of our endowments are restricted. One is restricted to the director’s salary, that one is from from the Fosters. There’s another that is restricted to the maintenance of the Foster Wing. Our biggest endowments are restricted to acquisitions, that can only be used for the purchase of art.

If the museum has its own endowment, what is the structure that puts ownership of the art in the hands of the museum?

Q&A with Rose Art Museum Director Michael Rush (Modern Art Notes)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Did the Deaccessioning Police Doom the Rose?Did the Deaccessioning Police Doom the Rose?
  • Who’s the Best Bet to Be Next for the Met?Who’s the Best Bet to Be Next for the Met?
  • The State of the RoseThe State of the Rose
  • The Brandeis-Madoff ConnectionThe Brandeis-Madoff Connection
  • What a Difference a Day MakesWhat a Difference a Day Makes
  • Brandeis: "We've Always Lived on the Edge."Brandeis: "We've Always Lived on the Edge."
  • Print
  • Tweet

Filed Under: Museums

Advertise on Art Market Monitor with Nectar Ads

Top Posts

  • The New York Times Still Doesn't Get Art & Money Laundering
  • David Hockney's $20m Pacific Coast Highway & Santa Monica
  • Man Ray's Noire et Blanche (€1-1.5m) Offered at Christie's France in November
  • Why I Am Leaving Gagosian
  • Podcast
  • Bonhams Brings Second Generation of Modern Vietnamese Art in Hong Kong
  • Newsletter
  • Tony Podesta's Secret Art Buying
  • About Us/ Contact
  • Sotheby's Brings $30m Pollock to New York


  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • Art Loans
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Advertise on Art Market Monitor