Art Market Monitor

Global Coverage ~ Unique Analysis

  • AMMpro
  • AMM Fantasy Collecting Game
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us

Rembrandt's Last Supper

January 5, 2009 by Marion Maneker

Rembrandt's Balthazar's FeastArt historian Barbara Rose gives the background to Rembrandt’s “Balthazar’s Feast” in another entry in the Wall Street Journal’s Masterpiece feature:

When Rembrandt painted “Balthazar’s Feast,” his masterly version of the banquet scene described by the prophet Daniel, he was just past 30. He and his young bride, Saskia von Uylenburgh, the daughter of a wealthy burgomeister, whose dowry he was about to squander, were finally moving to their own home. The future looked as bright as the colorful garments and as glittering as the jewels worn by King Balthazar and his court. [ . . . ]

As Rembrandt depicts the scene, we are witness to the moment the turbaned potentate realizes his reign is over as he reads the prophetic words. The inclusion of the viewer as part of the banquet party was a compositional novelty Rembrandt borrowed from Caravaggio’s revolutionary depiction of the risen Christ meeting two of his disciples in the “Supper at Emmaus.” By placing in the foreground the backs of the heads of the apostles surprised by the appearance of a resurrected Christ who stares directly at us, Caravaggio asks the spectator to become a witness like the audience in a theater.

Caravaggio, the master of chiaroscuro who popularized night scenes, died four years after Rembrandt was born, but no important artist of Rembrandt’s generation could ignore the theatricality of Caravaggio. His stark oppositions of light and dark created by illumination coming from within the painting as well as from outside the frame were introduced to Rembrandt by his teacher Pieter Lastman. In “Balthazar’s Feast” these contrasts are still strikingly dramatic and exaggerated. A few years later in “The Night Watch,” the painting that marked the beginning of Rembrandt’s financial decline and fall from fashion, these contrasts are softened into a dark and velvety golden glow. [ . . . ]

There are varied interpretations of the scene, either as an image of the punishment of vanity or as a caution against worshipping pagan idols, the accusation Dutch Protestants made against Catholics. Certainly the painting had a specific cultural meaning when Rembrandt painted it. The punishment of the sumptuous lifestyle of the Babylonian king may also have had a personal significance for Rembrandt, whose extravagant tastes were to ruin him.

Rembrandt’s Rich Banquet (Wall Street Journal)

More from Art Market Monitor

  • Louvre Abu Dhabi Announces Acquisition of £9.48m Rembrandt StudyLouvre Abu Dhabi Announces Acquisition of £9.48m Rembrandt Study
  • Christie’s Has Richard Feigen Collection in MayChristie’s Has Richard Feigen Collection in May
  • Christie’s Sells £11.4m Leyden Drawing to Benefit Rugby SchoolChristie’s Sells £11.4m Leyden Drawing to Benefit Rugby School
  • Getty Buys Previously Unknown Quentin Metsys PaintingGetty Buys Previously Unknown Quentin Metsys Painting
  • Christie’s to Sell Shickman Collection Led by Spanish Still LivesChristie’s to Sell Shickman Collection Led by Spanish Still Lives
  • Sotheby’s Has Two Caspar David Friedrich Works in DecemberSotheby’s Has Two Caspar David Friedrich Works in December

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Old Master

About Marion Maneker

LiveArt

Want to get Art Market Monitor‘s posts sent to you in our email? Sign up below by clicking on the Subscribe button.

  • About Us/ Contact
  • Podcast
  • AMMpro
  • Newsletter
  • FAQ

twitterfacebooksoundcloud
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
California Privacy Rights
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Advertise on Art Market Monitor
 

Loading Comments...