Art Market Monitor

The Financial Times’s Alphaville has an idea for why the van Dyck and Rembrandt pictures sold for large sums. They put it all up to inflation fears–which makes sense:

When faced with the very real prospect of currency devaluation, and mounting inflation expectations, the safest store of wealth should be tangible assets, such as housing, commodities and land, or claims on these assets.

As Aviate Global argue, surplus liquidity will chase supply-constrained assets.

A Rembrandt is one of the rarest assets possible to buy; one that should keep its value regardless of the fate of major world currencies.

Far from being a sign the wealthy are again willing to splash their cash, the bustle over at Christie’s could instead be signalling the pain still to come.

Unfortunately, inflation has become the received wisdom about the future of the world economy even though the present trend has been mostly deflationary. What will happen to these assets in a deflationary environment?

Luxury Purchases: The Rush for Real Assets (FT/Alphaville)

Also of Interest:

• Art Market Supported by Inflation Fears?
  Its a running theme of the global art market. In times of inflation, hard assets gain value. Some doubters point...
  
• The Rich Are Still Rich
  The World Wealth Report issued jointly by Cap Gemini and Merrill Lynch has just come out for 2010 with some...
  
• Inflation: The Art Dealer’s Friend
  The Economist‘s coverage of the art market is always sharp even if it involves using a variety of different writers...
  
• What Do the Rich Do with Their Money?
  Katya Kazakina asks a few questions of the folks who put together the World Wealth Report and finds out that...
  
• Breaking Views: Art Doesn’t Hedge Inflation
  The folks at BreakingViews.com make their money by offering trenchant analysis of the world economy. Sometimes they’re very good; other...