Art Market Monitor

Its a running theme of the global art market. In times of inflation, hard assets gain value. Some doubters point to the fact that true inflation means wages put pressure on profits that would presumably be the basis for art purchases. So there will be less money around in the hands of future buyers. What’s the solution? Well, buying A+ art might be the best defense. Which could explain the success of Impressionist works in the the Imp/Mod sales last week.

Here’s Georgina Adam in the Financial Times with a few choice quotes from some dealers who are more associated with the Contemporary market:

Among the strong bidders at the sales was the private London dealer Ivor Braka. Asked why he thought they had done so well, he said: “Perhaps people are anticipating global inflation, and want to put their money into something tangible,” while the art dealer José Mugrabi commented: “At the moment there is more money being produced than paintings.”

The Art Market: Stunning Sales and Bother at Basel (Financial Times)

Also of Interest:

• Inflation Fears Stalk Super-Rich
  The Financial Times’s Alphaville has an idea for why the van Dyck and Rembrandt pictures sold for large sums. They...
  
• The Story of Ivor Braka
  In the London Evening Standard, Godfrey Barker does a quick profile of dealer Ivor Braka. We took out all of...
  
• Inflation: The Art Dealer’s Friend
  The Economist‘s coverage of the art market is always sharp even if it involves using a variety of different writers...
  
• Breaking Views: Art Doesn’t Hedge Inflation
  The folks at BreakingViews.com make their money by offering trenchant analysis of the world economy. Sometimes they’re very good; other...
  
• Cash is Trash
  Godfrey Barker provides some colorful anecdotes on why the wealthy prefer art over cash in the Wall Street Journal: “It...