Art Market Monitor

Was Turner the Hirst of his day?

And Why Do They Make It Sound Like That’s A Bad Thing?

Adam Kirsch and Peter Schjeldahl don’t agree on the merit of Turner’s work but they do seem to agree on one thing: comparing J.M.W. Turner to Damien Hirst is an unqualified slam. Here’s Schjeldahl’s pithy put down:

He overlays splooshes of paint with passages of tidy drawing like bathtub decals. He did not anticipate Impressionism, which would submerge drawing in painting. William Hazlitt cited a view of his work as “pictures of nothing, and very like.” Actually, it is a congeries of misty, fiery, surfy, sunset stunts—an art less to contemplate than to talk about, calculated to jazz the talkiest of nations. Turner was the Damien Hirst of his day.

And Kirsch’s high-minded defense:

In life, Turner was indeed an ambitious man. But the ambition in his paintings is not personal, the way that Damien Hirst’s is; Turner did not simply leverage shock for fame. His is a spiritual ambition, a longing for transcendence so powerful that it could ignite a scarcely less magnificent longing in his pupil Ruskin.

Lifting the Veil: J.M.W. Turner and John Ruskin (NY Sun)

Heavy Weather (The New Yorker)

Also of Interest:

• Today in Damien Hirst: The Exhibitions
  From Mumbai to Bridgehampton, the reactions from the Hirst exhibitions have been revealing–and positive. The Indian press is getting its...
  
• Titling at Hirst
  Mark Hudson, writing in the Telegraph, makes a bold claim about the over-covered Hirst exhibition at the Wallace Collection: This...
  
• Hirst Hysterics
  Damien Hirst bashing is turning into a silly sport. First, we had Hirst as peevish scrooge because he was suing...
  
• Is Brit Art Turning the Page?
  Do these two seemingly unrelated items signal an important shift? In the first, Jonathan Jones frets in the Guardian: The...
  
• Hirst Gives In
  In the past, Damien Hirst has expressed an strong level of bitterness and contempt toward studio assistants who have asked...